<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>My Next One Will Be Better &#187; Chris Soth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andycoughlan.co.uk/tag/chris-soth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andycoughlan.co.uk</link>
	<description>Andy Coughlan&#039;s Screenwriting and Filmmaking Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:20:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Soth vs. Snyder!</title>
		<link>http://www.andycoughlan.co.uk/soth-vs-snyder/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andycoughlan.co.uk/soth-vs-snyder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Coughlan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Screenwriting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blake Snyder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Soth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screenplay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Structure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andycoughlan.co.uk/?p=307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Return to Earth, which I&#8217;d put on the back burner for NaNoWriMo is now back in the forefront of my mind, especially after the interesting news I got from Ben the other day.  While I was working through all my notes for the second draft, I came to the realisation that even with one and &#8230; </p><p><a class="more-link block-button" href="http://www.andycoughlan.co.uk/soth-vs-snyder/">Continue reading &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.returntoearth.at/once/" target="_blank">Return to Earth</a>, which I&#8217;d put on the back burner for NaNoWriMo is now back in the forefront of my mind, especially after the <a href="http://www.returntoearth.at/once/?p=28" target="_blank">interesting news I got from Ben</a> the other day. </p>
<p>While I was working through all my notes for the second draft, I came to the realisation that even with one and half drafts under my belt, which more or less hit the <a title="Blake Snyder's Beat Sheet" href="http://www.scriptcafe.org/Scriptcafe/The%20Craft/13BE2DB5-1C91-4E9D-B2D6-D346BECFA730_files/BSH%20Structure%20Template.pdf" target="_blank">Blake Snyder Beat Sheet</a> note for note, I really wasn&#8217;t happy with it.  </p>
<p>Some of the reasons I could put my finger on &#8211; mainly cost and complexity of production, but there was something else&#8230; it felt flabby.  Perhaps there were too many characters not doing enough?  Some got given the heave-ho, but still no joy.  </p>
<p>As chance would have it, I&#8217;d randomly signed up for <a title="Chris Soth" href="http://www.screenplaybyphone.com/" target="_blank">Chris Soth&#8217;s &#8216;Screenplay by Phone&#8217;</a> call about his Mini Movie method which, whilst not mad enough to stay up &#8217;til half past three in the morning to dial in, I did <a href="http://www.screenplaybyphone.com/" target="_blank">listen to via download later that week</a>.</p>
<p>And inspiration struck!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying Chris has struck gold with his Mini Movie method; I don&#8217;t think he gave enough detail away on the call to say either way, but what he did impart was enough for me.</p>
<p>Now, I love <a title="Blake Snyder" href="http://www.blakesnyder.com/" target="_blank">Blake Snyder&#8217;s STC! methodology</a>.  It works &#8211; some of the best films and books hit the beats spot on. But both of the screenplays I&#8217;ve completed in the past year or so just didn&#8217;t do it for me.  They needed something more.</p>
<p>So I started pondering whether Soth and Snyder couldn&#8217;t snuggle up in bed together, see if the two models didn&#8217;t overlap a little.  And whaddayaknow?! They do. Kind of.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a perfect marriage, but for me, using Soth&#8217;s Mini-Movie method (effectively splitting the story up into smaller sub-movies) means my little brain can get a much better grip on the story as a whole.</p>
<p>Now, as much as I like it, I do find the STC! methodology a bit lacking in the middle.  Blake says a lot about how to start and how to end, but I&#8217;ve always struggled with the whole &#8216;Discussion &#8211; Break Into 2 &#8211; Fun and Games&#8217; bit.  Soth&#8217;s method gives that area a little more structure, enough for me to get my head round better.</p>
<p>By adding Chris to the mix, along with my own take on Dramatica, Blake&#8217;s key beats are still there, but rather than trying to just satisfy story logic, the story is now looking after itself, driving itself forward with purpose that I&#8217;d never been able to capture with STC!s 40 beat structure alone.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s worth checking both methodologies out (along with <a title="Dramatica" href="http://dramatica.com/" target="_blank">Dramatica</a>), but I guess this kind of proves that there is no panacea for Screenwriting, no magic pill for the perfect screenplay.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just a case of keep doing it until you find what works for you, and then keep going&#8230; and going&#8230; and going&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andycoughlan.co.uk/soth-vs-snyder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

